Navigating student rights, especially regarding school discipline, requires much knowledge of those rights, including those federally guaranteed and guaranteed at the state or local level.
Whether in a public or private school, students are afforded fundamental rights that they and their parents should be aware of, especially regarding disciplinary enforcement. Unfortunately, students and parents are not often aware of these fundamental rights, nor do they have legal recourse should these rights be infringed upon by excessive disciplinary measures. This is where professionals and consultants, such as student supervision, student discipline, student injury liability, and student abuse experts, can help as these professionals can assess the legality and standard of care of disciplinary measures implemented by schools. Understanding the complexity of navigating student rights when it comes to discipline and using student supervision and safety experts warrants going over some of the various rights of students and common misunderstandings.
Fundamental Student Rights
- Students are afforded the same fundamental rights as any American citizen. This means, for instance, they are afforded the right to free speech as promised by the First Amendment and freedom from cruel and unusual punishment as promised by the Eighth Amendment. Of course, as a student supervision expert would point out, infringement of these rights is sometimes less clear-cut, and often, interpretative work has to be done to assess whether or not there has been a genuine infringement. For example, though a student has a right to free speech, this doesn’t include the right to speech that would disrupt or prevent a school from carrying out its intended goal of educating students. Determining what constitutes “free speech” within the confines of school can be contentious. In such cases, student discipline experts would look into a case to see if a student is being disciplined for problematically disruptive speech. Regarding freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, student supervision and student abuse experts might see if disciplinary measures achieve the goal of disincentivizing bad behavior appropriately or if it goes beyond the purview of acceptability.
Basic Non-Discrimination
- Since the Civil Rights movement, the US has engaged in an ongoing project to curb discrimination against school students. A famous example is Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in programs that receive federal funding, such as schools. Non-discrimination means students cannot be disciplined based on their identities or expressions. While student supervision experts might quickly pinpoint overt instances of disciplinary discrimination, some interpretative work is often required here, especially when differentiating behavioral constraints from discrimination. Behavioral rules imposed on students can go too far, especially if it leads to a student being disciplined for a basic expression of identity. Student discipline experts try to distinguish between reasonable behavioral constraints and discriminatory discipline. For instance, even in a religious private school, a student who does not share the faith of the school cannot be punished for her own religious belief; a student supervision expert would determine whether the student is being disciplined for acceptably constrained behavior or an inviolable practice of faith.
Bias in Discipline
- Bias in discipline is similar to non-discrimination but can be much more subtle. In such cases, a student or group of students might face individual instances of disciplinary measures that are seemingly reasonable. Still, this could count as disciplinary bias if they are disproportionately targeted over time without due reason. There are many potential instances of such bias. Such selective discipline could be a simple mask for essential discrimination, or it could be a case of a teacher who, for whatever reason, simply dislikes a particular student. Student supervision experts would pinpoint such cases by looking for disproportional and targeted enforcement that is not leveled at other students possibly engaging in the same activity. The need for student supervision and safety professionals is clear, as some sort of comparative analysis is often necessary to establish disciplinary bias in this regard.
Rights for Students with Disabilities
- Schools are required by federal law, including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, to ensure that students with disabilities have equal access to all educational opportunities and are not discriminated against in disciplinary enforcement. Student supervision experts would ensure that the accessibility that students with disabilities are entitled to extends to reasonable accommodations, including accommodation in the realm of discipline. For instance, a student who has mobility issues and might not be able to get to classes on time should not face punishment for being late to class. A student with Tourettes should not face punishment for “disrupting the class” for involuntary tics they have no control over. Student injury liability experts, student abuse experts as well as other student supervision experts would look for instances of such issues that stem from disabilities being misportrayed as behavioral issues warranting discipline.
LGBTQ+ Rights
- Of course, LGBTQ+ rights are intimately connected with non-discrimination. However, they warrant extra focus, given that LGBTQ+ identity is an evolving concept that has become increasingly contentious in recent years. When it comes to LGBTQ+ rights, infringements thereof are often passed off as behavioral discipline rather than discrimination based on identity. As should be clear by now, the dividing line between student behavior and essential expressions of identity could be clearer-cut, and this is where student supervision experts or other student supervision and safety professionals come into use.
Multiple Legal Layers
- Many students and parents need to realize that student rights can be multilayered. In some cases, state laws might grant students more rights than what they are already guaranteed by federal law. Also, there might even be local laws, as given by school districts or municipalities, that further imbue the students with even more rights than federal and state law guaranteed. Navigating this web of complexities to ensure disciplinary measures do not run afoul of any of the rights guaranteed to a student at any level is part of the value of student supervision experts. Another use of such professionals is determining when there is a legal contradiction, such as when state or local laws contradict federal law, and ensuring that the student’s more fundamental rights are not upended.
Public and Private Schools
- Many parents and students are under the impression that when it comes to student rights in private schools, these schools may operate outside of the bounds of usual educational standards and laws, including when it comes to discipline. While it is true that private schools have more operative independence, including when it comes to often having more stringent behavioral constraints, students are still afforded fundamental rights that can not be trampled over. Part of the job of student supervision experts is to effectively disambiguate legitimate instances of behavioral constraints and discipline that might not be found in public schools from illegitimate infringement upon student rights as guaranteed by the federal and state governments.
Experts Can Help Protect Student Rights
Navigating student rights, especially regarding school discipline, requires much knowledge of those rights, including those federally guaranteed and guaranteed at the state or local level. However, it also requires the experience and capacity to interpret when a disciplinary measure is fair and constitutes an infringement of a student’s rights. This is why student supervision experts and other student supervision experts and safety experts shine in doing the interpretative work on behalf of parents, students, and even schools that want to ensure their disciplinary measures are acceptable. It is rarely the case that excessive disciplinary measures are so overt that no interpretative analysis is required. These consultants and experts are in increasing demand because they can navigate the myriad laws and disentangle acceptable discipline from the excessive.
Join the conversation!