Virginia transplant coordinator isn’t given leniency in records access case.
A former Virginia health care worker, Trent Russell, has been sentenced to two years in prison after illegally accessing Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s medical records shortly before her death. Russell, 34, a transplant coordinator for the Washington Regional Transplant Community, allegedly abused his position to view the former judge’s records without authorization. During a trial earlier this year, Russell was found guilty of accessing and tampering with health records but was acquitted of a charge alleging he publicly released the information online around the time that Ginsberg was receiving public scrutiny over her ability to serve.
The case drew attention due to the timing and nature of Russell’s actions. In 2019, when rumors about Ginsburg’s health were spreading, Russell accessed her private health records and, according to prosecutors, shared them in online forums associated with conspiracy theories and antisemitic discussions. It was alleged that he posted a false claim that Ginsburg had already died, adding to the public’s uncertainty about her health and judicial role. Ginsburg, who was 87 at the time, continued to serve on the court until her death in 2020.
Russell’s motivation for accessing Ginsburg’s records remains unclear. Throughout the investigation and trial, he denied responsibility, offering unusual excuses for his actions, including a claim that his cat may have accessed the data by walking across his keyboard. His consistent lack of accountability frustrated both investigators and the jury, leading prosecutors to call for a harsher penalty. Prosecutor Zoe Bedell criticized Russell’s justifications as implausible, citing his refusal to accept responsibility as one of the primary reasons for requesting a longer prison term. Russell’s legal team, however, sought probation or home detention, pointing to his previous service as a transplant coordinator and his military experience, including a deployment to Afghanistan, as grounds for leniency. Attorney Charles Burnham, defending Russell, argued that his client’s history of saving lives through his work should be considered alongside his criminal actions. In a statement to the court, Burnham described Russell’s actions as a “stupid mistake,” suggesting that his past conduct showed a pattern of integrity and dedication to others.
U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff, however, was not swayed by these arguments, instead condemning Russell’s conduct as both ethically and legally unacceptable. Nachmanoff pointed out Russell’s failure to show remorse or accept responsibility, saying that his attempts to blame a pet for the violation further undermined his credibility, which would be factored in when the defendant was sentenced. The judge characterized Russell’s conduct as “truly despicable,” stressing the unique violation of privacy and trust involved in the case. Nachmanoff also highlighted the sensitivity of health information, drawing a comparison between Ginsburg’s data and Russell’s own personal experience. Russell had previously requested privacy protections for his own family’s medical details, specifically for a sick stepparent. The judge remarked on the irony that Russell sought to shield his family’s medical privacy while violating the same for Ginsburg.
The court proceedings brought to light how public figures like Justice Ginsburg are particularly vulnerable to privacy breaches. Although the former judge held a position of great influence, prosecutors argued that her public role, advanced age, and well-known health challenges made her more susceptible to being exploited. Russell’s defense team countered that claim, arguing that Ginsburg’s position of authority made her different from typical victims of privacy breaches and, as a public figure, this minimized the impact of the breach. Judge Nachmanoff dismissed the defense’s argument and sentenced the defendant to two years behind bars.
The legal case serves as a reminder of the importance of data protection and the ethical obligations of those who handle sensitive information. For patients, especially public figures, confidence in the security of their medical records is vital, and breaches of this trust are taken seriously by the courts. By holding Russell accountable, the court aimed to reinforce the significance of medical privacy rights and the severe consequences for those who disregard them.
After he was sentenced, neither Russell nor his lawyer indicated any plans for appeal.
Sources:
Man Who Illegally Accessed Ginsburg’s Medical Records Gets 2 Years in Prison
Health care worker gets 2 years for accessing Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s medical records
Join the conversation!